The Building Blocks of Interoperability. A Multisite Analysis of Patient Demographic Attributes Available for Matching.

BackgroundPatient matching is a key barrier to achieving interoperability. Patient demographic elements must be consistently collected over time and region to be valuable elements for patient matching.ObjectivesWe sought to determine what patient demographic attributes are collected at multiple institutions in the United States and see how their availability changes over time and across clinical sites.MethodsWe compiled a list of 36 demographic elements that stakeholders previously identified as essential patient demographic attributes that should be collected for the purpose of linking patient records. We studied a convenience sample of 9 health care systems from geographically distinct sites around the country. We identified changes in the availability of individual patient demographic attributes over time and across clinical sites.ResultsSeveral attributes were consistently available over the study period (2005-2014) including last name (99.96%), first name (99.95%), date of birth (98.82%), gender/sex (99.73%), postal code (94.71%), and full street address (94.65%). Other attributes changed significantly from 2005-2014: Social security number (SSN) availability declined from 83.3% to 50.44% (p<0.0001). Email address availability increased from 8.94% up to 54% availability (p<0.0001). Work phone number increased from 20.61% to 52.33% (p<0.0001).ConclusionsOverall, first name, last name, date of birth, gender/sex and address were widely collected across institutional sites and over time. Availability of emerging attributes such as email and phone numbers are increasing while SSN use is declining. Understanding the relative availability of patient attributes can inform strategies for optimal matching in healthcare

Spirometry use in patientswith sickle cell disease with and without asthma and acute chest syndrome: Amulticenter study

A de‐identified data repository of electronic medical record data, i2b2 (Informatics for Integrating Biology and the Bedside), including four geographically diverse academic medical centers, was queried to determine the use of diagnostic spirometry testing in African American children and young adults 5‐34 years of age with sickle cell disease (SCD) with or without a documented history of asthma and/or acute chest syndrome (ACS). A total of 2749 patients were identified with SCD, of these 577 had asthma and 409 had ACS. Cross‐referencing the CPT code for diagnostic spirometry showed that for patients identified as having SCD, a history of ACS, and a diagnosis of asthma, only 31% across all four centers had spirometry. Having an asthma diagnosis was associated with ACS. Among SCD patients with asthma, the proportion with ACS for the four centers was 47%, 75%, 38%, and 36% respectively. The bivariate association between asthma and ACS for each Center was significant for each (P < .001). To summarize, only one third of patients with co‐morbid SCD, ACS, and asthma received the spirometry procedure as recommended in evidence‐based guidelines, suggesting limited testing for changes in pulmonary function. Future studies to determine barriers and facilitators to implementation of pulmonary testing in SCD are warranted

Further validation of "timed up and go" in stroke patients

Objective: To compare the Barthel Index (BI), a well-known and accepted measure of functional disability, with Timed Up and Go (TUG). Method: Thirty-three stroke patients had their BI and TUG assessed by independent blinded observers. Results: There was good agreement between BI and TUG, with good repeatability. Conclusion: Thus TUG is a good measure of function pre-discharge but needs to be further validated on more disabled patients

Controlled trial of multidisciplinary care teams for acutely ill medical inpatients: enhanced multidisciplinary care

Background: Acute hospital general medicine services care for ageing complex patients, using the skills of a range of health-care providers. Evidence suggests that comprehensive early assessment and discharge planning may improve efficiency and outcomes of care in older medical patients. Aim: To enhance assessment, communication, care and discharge planning by restructuring consistent, patient-centred multidisciplinary teams in a general medicine service. Methods: Prospective controlled trial enrolling 1538 consecutive medical inpatients. Intervention units with additional allied health staff formed consistent multidisciplinary teams aligned with inpatient admitting units rather than wards; implemented improved communication processes for early information collection and sharing between disciplines; and specified shared explicit discharge goals. Control units continued traditional, referral-based multidisciplinary models with existing staffing levels. Results: Access to allied health services was significantly enhanced. There was a trend to reduced index length of stay in the intervention units (7.3 days vs 7.8 days in control units, P = 0.18), with no change in 6-month readmissions. in-hospital mortality was reduced from 6.4 to 3.9% (P = 0.03); less patients experienced functional decline in hospital (P = 0.04) and patients' ratings of health status improved (P = 0.02). Additional staffing costs were balanced by potential bed-day savings. Conclusion: This model of enhanced multidisciplinary inpatient care has provided sustainable efficiency gains for the hospital and improved patient outcomes